What Is the Responsibility of Corporate Sponsors? The Sochi Games and Human Rights

The role of corporate sponsors is under scrutiny— as the Winter Olympic Games about to kick off in Sochi. The international community—companies included— here we should seek evidence that they are addressing the risks to human rights in their own operations. Indeed, Major sporting events present a potential advantage to the local economy and national pride. However, the costs of such events are often shouldered by the country’s—and the world’s—most vulnerable people.

Standards like the United Nations Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights codify business’ responsibility to respect human rights. What does that mean specifically for companies involved in major sporting events?

  1. Companies that provide uniforms, equipment, and branded merchandise should have full visibility of their supply chains. Particularly with goods produced for a one-time event, where there might not be an extended relationship with a supplier, it might be tempting to ignore working conditions in favor of just getting this one order through. Brands have been called out in the past for how and where they’ve sourced Olympic uniforms, and following the Rana Plaza tragedy, public scrutiny continues to rise.
  2. Human Rights Watch has cataloged human rights abuses leading up to the Sochi Games, including the exploitation of migrant workers in the construction of related facilities. Companies involved in infrastructure development should follow the Dhaka Principles for Migration with Dignity. For example, they should make sure that wages are paid on time and in full, and that no passports or identity documents are retained.
  3. The travel and tourism sector should use available resources to ensure that they’re not facilitating human trafficking and child sex tourism. And visitors to Sochi might want to patronize those companies that have signed onto the Tourism Child-Protection Code of Conduct.

Companies might want to refrain from lecturing others on their human rights practices until they have their own houses in order. Whether withdrawing from a collective body that is undermining their own more progressive positions, or making sure they practice what they preach, companies should engage in lobbying that is consistent with their own policies, commitments, strategy, and actions.

Human rights campaigners are right to seek every possible lever to pressure difficult governments. But we should all be watching the corporate sponsors and partners of major sporting events for not just what they say, but what they do.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s